Archive for the 'Usability' Category

Information Architecture - copy the organizational structure or follow the user experience, not that easy

Date Thursday, September 4th, 2008 Posts Posted by Bruce Spurr

I was intruiged by a recent post by Jeremiah at the Web-Strategist.com about how the search box in a browser is circumventing the address field. I read this after sitting with a client today and discussing their mamoth 3.2 million page website. Third client actually, the first one had 100,000 pages, and second one has about 1,000 pages. How do you organize all that content?!

So here is an idea i’ve been toying with for a while. A colleague at Jufa Intermedia and I drew it out on a whiteboard over lunch one day. Should we develop it?

The idea is developing a CMS that treats pages as stand-alone pieces of micro-content. Here is the gambit: the navigation structure is dynamically created, and the pages are easy to find using search tools. So you can both explore and/or search for specific elements. If you don’t know what you want but know the topic you explore, and if you do know exactly what you want you can narrow your search down rapidly. But wait, there’s more…

People don’t usually consume whole websites, they use parts of it at any given moment of need.  Search boxes are the second most used navigation element within most sites, yet most site-specific search functions… well, frankly suck.

One of the biggest problems client’s have is
how they will structure their IA:

copy the organization’s operational structure

or

discover how the user  consumes the information provided.

The answer is sort of obvious from an effective marketing stand-point - you design for the user. But it’s not that simple, because in larger organizations, the workflow of how content is published does not usually correspond to how the world consumes that information. So if you can’t create good content, then your “effective” user experience is for naught.

So instead of publishing to an area that you are responsible for maintaining, you simply publish for various categories (to seed the choice), you tag it and you tell it who your intended audience is from pre-loaded user-profiles. So you don’t publish to a part of the site, you publish to the TYPE of person you want to read the content.

 

The CMS will dynamically generate menus based on traffic patterns for each pre-determined user type.

It will guess at what a particular user is looking for based on what the user is looking at and how long they spend looking at it. That’s the first part. Second, is that each page must standalone. So you publish a page so it can be found using an onsite search engine. You can categorize and tag, as you may a blog entry. So instead of a site of pages linked together through a man-made and stagnant architecture, you effectively create a catalog of the content.

 

Imagine surfing a large site
(1,000+ pages) like you would looking for a book on Amazon.

You have recommendations based on previous experience, you have recommendations based on others experience, you have categories you can browse, and you have simple and advanced search functions for narrowing your results. If the content contains “web 2.0″ user-generated features such as comments, ratings, etc. then they can be integrated into the CMS as well, by helping rank search results, and offering new navigations methods.

So, any VC’s out there want to fund this project? :)

Bruce

How does the cost of a meal in Mexico relate to web usability?

Date Sunday, February 10th, 2008 Posts Posted by Bruce Spurr

So I recently returned from a vacation near Cancun, Mexico. First let me say, that a week off sucks. “Wow Bruce you’re finally starting to relax!” - that was quoted to me on the day before we left! Ack. You need a week to unwind and at least another week to start recovery. Anyway… just a little life lesson, do with it what you want.

Let me tell you , i was shocked, SHOCKED!, at the cost of food. On an enclosed resort with no competition, they can charge whatever they want. So I forked out $20/meal on average. Good food, fine, I can take it. But then I went into town. It was the same damn thing. Seriously, I paid more for a cab ride in Cancun, Mexico than I did in Manhattan. Nonetheless, how can food and service be the same cost? $75 for a 60 minute massage. $6 for a mojito. Come on..

Then I walked one block up from the beach. Massage, $33 for 60 minutes, mojito $4, meals $10.

2 blocks up, massage $10, mojito $2, and meals $4-5.

I didn’t venture further away… ;)

But this is what the cost of pretty much anything in Mexico looks like:

Cancun Mexico cost graph

Essentially the further you are from the beach, it’s an exponential decay in cost. Things get cheap fast the further you are from the beach. From food, drink and service to real estate.

So how does this relate to web usability?

Well let’s take the same graph, but this time, let’s replace the horizontal scale to the # of clicks it takes to pull your prospect into your funnel and close them on whatever it is you ar trying to get them to do (buy, sign-up, click an ad, etc).

Web impact graph - results vs number of clicks

So the further you engage your prospect from your home or landing page, the less likely you are to close that individual.

Lesson?

Get them intruiged fast.

Answer their questions faster.

Get them into your sales/action funnel ASAP.

The longer you let them drift on your site, the less likely you get the results you want.

Questions? Drop me a line.

Bruce



© 2007 Pioneering Innovation Inc. All rights reserved.
Close
E-mail It